Posts Tagged ‘wills and trusts attorney’

Estate’s former attorney disqualified from representing client in action to remove executor

Friday, September 5th, 2008

A court rules that attorneys for estates necessarily have an attorney-client relationship with the estate’s executor. This disqualifies an estate’s former attorney from later representing another client in an action to remove the executor.

In his capacity as the executor of the estate, Frank Harris retained an attorney, Joseph Brady, to assist in the administration of the estate. Counsel represented the estate for one year, until his representation was terminated. Thereafter, a beneficiary of the estate petitioned the court to remove the executor named under the will and to appoint her instead. The challenger was represented by the former attorney of the estate who was terminated.

The executor challenged the petition and moved to disqualify the challenger’s counsel, asserting that Mr. Brady’s former representation of the estate created an impermissible conflict with his new client. Mr. Brady opposed the petition, arguing that no conflict existed because in representing the estate, he represented only the estate and not the estate’s executor.

The Court disagrees with Mr. Brady’s argument that he represented the estate and not the executor. “When attorneys state they are appearing on behalf of an estate,” the court writes, “such a statement is technically incorrect because the attorney is representing the personal representative of the estate, and not the estate itself or the beneficiaries of the estate.” Accordingly, an impermissible conflict of interest exists and the court grants the motion to disqualify Mr. Brady as counsel for petitioner.

Pitfalls of Improperly Drafted Will

Friday, August 29th, 2008

A number of years ago, I received a call from a potential client who had the following tale to tell.  The woman’s husband had died leaving a will and some assets, one of which was a 401k. The marriage was a second for her husband, who had 2 sons from his first marriage.  While he was single he had changed the beneficiaries of his life insurance and 401k plan to his sons and had redone his will.
 
After his second marriage, the husband and his new wife bought a new home together.  They asked their real estate attorney, who handled the purchase for them, to draft new wills as well.  The husband listed for his attorney the assets he wanted to pass to his sons and which to his new wife.  The 401k he wanted to go to his wife. Unfortunately, the attorney didn’t understand the difference between probate and non-probate assets.  So when he wrote  a will that specifically left the 401k to the wife, he didn’t know that the will would have no effect on this asset because the beneficiary designations on file with the custodian of the 401k plan still listed the sons from the first marriage.
 
When the husband died, the wife received a big shock when she was told that she had no interest in the $500,000 account.  That’s because a will doesn’t automatically control the distribution of all your assets.  Contract property such as life insurance, annuities and retirement accounts pass in accordance with whom you have designated on the beneficiary forms completed and filed with the life insurance and annuity companies or retirement account custodians.  Other types of property pass by operation of law such as joint accounts with right of survivorship or real estate that is owned by husband and wife.  When one owner dies the property automatically passes to the surviving owner.  It does not matter what the will says.
 
That is what happened in our story.  The 401k is contract property so it passed according to the beneficiary designation form on file, not by the will.  The wife tried unsuccessfully to get a court order directing the funds be paid to her.

The moral of the story is that although many people think drafting a will is simple and often undertake to do it themselves or ask the attorney who did other work for them to handle this task as well, they may miss important steps that must be taken that can save a lot of heartache and money. 

This example is further reason why attorneys should reconsider doing “simple wills” when requested by a client.  Simple does not mean right.  For more information on this post, contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.