As the current economic crisis deepens, it is becoming increasingly clear that we are heading into uncharted waters, in so many respects.  Specifically, however, I am talking about the long term care arena.
Dad owns a home in which he lives.  Home health aides come into the home to assist Dad but as his health deteriorates, he needs increased care.  His son, John believes that Dad will very soon need to move to a nursing facility.  Now, here is where it gets interesting.

Dad took a reverse mortgage for $300,000 and he took it in a lump sum.  John’s plan was to invest the money in the market, get a decent rate of return that would help meet Dad’s expenses.  Well, we know what has happened in the past year.  The stock market has headed south.  Dad’s investment headed south too.  He lost roughly half of his investment.  That’s bad enough.  But here is the problem.  John transferred the money to an account in his name.  Not because he intended to keep it, but because it was just easier to manage the funds that way.

When he did that, however, he caused a Medicaid transfer penalty.  In New Jersey that penalty is approximately 3 and ½ years.  So what happens when Dad sells his home and uses the sale proceeds (less the amount he pays back to the bank) for his nursing home care?  He will be ineligible for Medicaid unless John transfers back the money.  Except that he doesn’t have all of it.

I know.  You’re thinking, “Will Medicaid really deny Dad’s application if John can show that the loss in value occurred in the market, and that he didn’t take the money?”  I don’t know.  Maybe, maybe not.  You see, we are living in unusual times.  Many states are struggling with budget deficits.  Medicaid is one of the biggest, if not the biggest, program for most states.  If they don’t have the money to fund these programs I can certainly see New Jersey applying the Medicaid rules as written and impose a penalty.  If Dad is ineligible for 3 and ½ years he may never live to receive Medicaid, something the government no doubt may consider when trying to balance its budget.

And just another reason why you can’t afford to be unprepared when it comes to long term care.

For further information and advice in any Medicaid matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 888-800-7442, or email info@fnlawyerinnj.com.

Dad has been living in an assisted living facility for 3 years at a cost of $4500 per month.  He likes it there, is safe and well cared for.  There is one small problem.  He is running out of money and the family is becoming desperate.
 
Fortunately, some states have Medicaid programs that cover assisted living care but the rules can vary significantly from nursing home Medicaid. In New Jersey, for example, if income exceeds the Medicaid cap ($2022 per month in 2009) the assisted living program won’t, under any circumstances, be an option.  For those needing nursing home care, on the other hand, we have two Medicaid programs, one for those who do not exceed income limits and a second for those who do. 

The application process for Medicaid can take months or longer.  If, for example, Dad becomes eligible and applies for Medicaid beginning in February, it might take until April, or longer in some cases, for him to receive approval.  In the case of nursing home Medicaid whenever Dad is approved payments will be made on his behalf retroactive to when he first applied (assuming of course that he was eligible in that month).  Not so for assisted living Medicaid.  Approval is not retroactive.

As an elder law attorney, our focus with clients is on the financial requirements of Medicaid.  I always, however, remind clients that we can’t forget about the medical requirement.  The applicant must meet the test of medical necessity for nursing home level care as determined by a Medicaid nurse who visits the applicant.  In New Jersey, this is true even in the case of assisted living.  It bears repeating.  The assisted living Medicaid applicant must be certified as needing nursing home level care.  Fail that test and the asset and income levels are irrelevant.

So, if Dad can’t get Medicaid, what then?  If he can’t pay the bill he generally won’t be able to stay in the assisted living facility unless the family pays for his care.  Not a great result but one the family could have avoided.  Before he entered the facility a plan should have been put in place to cover the possibility that he could run out of money.  In some cases that may involve planning, determining what public benefits he can or cannot receive and when, (such as VA Aid and Attendance benefits) or negotiating a contractual modification with the assisted living residence before initial entry.

The mistake that Dad and his family made is in not looking far enough down the road and failing to sit down with someone knowledgeable about the various issues and pitfalls, such as an elder law attorney.  The lesson to be learned is that you can’t wait until the money runs out to then answer the question “What do I do now?”

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 888-800-7442, or email info@fnlawyerinnj.com.

Jane calls us to relate the same problem that many Americans today are coping with, trying to care for aging parents.  She calls because Dad’s health is rapidly deteriorating and she fears he will need nursing home care.  I ask about Mom’s health.  Jane replies that she is healthy.  And here is the twist, where the story becomes more complicated.

Jane tells me that Mom and Dad have been separated for years, never divorced, just living separate lives under separate roofs, with separate assets.  “Dad was never easy to live with”, she tells me, “but Mom wasn’t the type to file for divorce.  It wasn’t acceptable.”  “So”, she asks me, “we can spend down Dad’s assets and then qualify him for Medicaid, right?”

“Well”, I tell her, “it is a bit more complicated than that”.  Under Medicaid rules, because they are still married, all their assets are combined for purposes of calculating how much to spend down.  Mom may have to spend some of her assets for Dad’s care even though they have been living single lives for years.  “Is there anything we can do,” Jane asks, as I hear the desperation in her voice.

Divorce is still an option, although it could be considerably more difficult if Dad doesn’t have the mental capacity to understand the legal process and consent to a divorce settlement.  There is also the matter of the State scrutinizing the divorce, especially if Mom has accumulated and wants to keep more than 50% of the combined assets.  You see, the State assumes the divorce was obtained for the purpose of qualifying for Medicaid.  If Mom keeps more than half of the assets Dad would probably be turned down for benefits.  There may also be other strategies that we have discussed for married couples that could be employed to preserve assets for Mom but, although they are married under the law, they are not really “together”.  So preserving Dad’s assets for Mom and vice versa is not the goal.

As Jane puts it, “Mom and Dad have lived separate lives for many years.  Mom has struggled to accumulate her own assets and become self sufficient.  How can I tell her that she will lose some of her hard earned money?”  An answer is not easy to give.  I do, however, have one for others who may one day be in that situation.  If any of Jane’s story sounds familiar to you, don’t wait till long term care is staring you in the face.  Plan ahead and solve the problem before it reaches crisis proportions or you’ll be faced with the dilemma that Jane and her family face.

For further information and advice in any Medicaid matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 888-800-7442, or email info@fnlawyerinnj.com.

Many times the children of elderly clients ask whether they can be held responsible for Mom or Dad’s long term care costs.  My answer always was that there wasn’t anything to worry about unless you take your parents money.  That no longer appears to be the case.

A recent case in Connecticut highlights how the new Medicaid laws passed as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 are really hurting residents and nursing homes alike and now potentially also affecting other family members.  In that court case, the nursing home resident’s son signed the admission agreement on behalf of his mother.  As in most nursing home agreements Son was asked to sign as responsible party, which he did not do.  Nevertheless, Nursing Home advised him verbally that he was the responsible party.

Son then applied for Medicaid benefits on behalf of Mom.  Son did not, however, follow through on the application process in a timely manner.  He failed to provide all the information and documentation that the State needed and he did not spend down Mom’s assets quickly enough, delaying the application’s approval.  As a result, months of benefits were lost, never to be regained, benefits that Nursing Home would have received.

Nursing Home sued Son on a breach of contract claim.  It claimed that Son undertook an obligation on Mom’s behalf, when he signed the admission agreement, to promptly pursue Medicaid benefits.  Son, in response, argued that he never signed the agreement so there was no contractual obligation on his part.  The court sided with Nursing Home, finding that an oral contract was created between the two parties and that Son violated it by not conscientiously following through.

A good result for the nursing home, right?  Well, not really, when you account for the time and money it took Nursing Home to get the judgment.  It then has to collect on that judgment, assuming Son doesn’t appeal the decision, which will cause the matter to drag on even further.  And it certainly wasn’t a good result for son, who lost and now is responsible for paying Mom’s bill.  

So how could this have turned out better? If Nursing Home had encouraged Son to retain an elder law attorney to represent Mom in the Medicaid application process, it would have received a regular income stream with a timely and correctly filed application.  Sure, there is an expense involved in hiring someone.  But in the end Nursing Home would have received Medicaid benefits when it should have and Son would not be responsible for paying nursing home.  A winning result for all.

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

“According to some sources, 60% of us will need long term care sometime during our lives. It is important for all of us to prepare for that day when we will need to help loved ones with elder care or we will need elder care for ourselves.”

“It is simply a fact of life to prepare financially for unexpected disasters by covering our homes, automobiles and health with insurance policies and to provide funding for our retirement. But no other life event can be as devastating to our lifestyle, finances and security as needing long term care. It drastically alters or completely eliminates the three principal retirement dreams of elderly Americans, which are:

1. Remaining independent in the home without intervention from others
2. Maintaining good health and receiving adequate health care
3. Having enough money for everyday needs and not outliving assets and income

Yet, it is our experience that the majority of the American public does not plan for the devastating crisis of needing elder care. This lack of planning also has an adverse effect on the older person’s family, with sacrifices made in time, money, family lifestyles and even affecting the family’s or caregiver’s medical and emotional health.

Because of changing demographics and potential changes in government funding, the current generation — more-than-ever — needs to plan for long term care.

If you have spent time helping a parent or loved one cope with a disability resulting from aging, you know the frustration of balancing what you feel they need to do and what they want to do. Communication is strained at times, because after all, you are the child and they the parent, yet physically and mentally the rolls have changed.

When you make directives, assignments and arrangements in advance of needing elder care, then everyone involved can follow the prearranged care plan.

As an example, Jefferson Simpson wrote in his care plan that if dementia or Alzheimer’s inhibited his mental abilities to communicate or recognize his surroundings, he wished to be in a respectable facility and only asked that he be visited and brought chocolates. To his children this request seemed silly at the time, but when his mental capacities did diminish, the instructions were there. No one had to wonder if they should try to take care of Father Jefferson at home and how they would do it. Without quilt or question they placed him in a respectable facility that took care of his needs. All they had to do was make loving visits, and of course they brought chocolates.

In order for Jefferson’s simple request to happen, he had made financial, legal and personal long term care plans years before.

What do you want your children or friends to do on your behalf?

When it comes time for them to help, what if you can’t say what you want because of a physical or mental disability? This is where a written long term care plan comes into effect.
 
Do you have a financial plan or long term care insurance? Retirement savings can disappear quickly when used for care services.
 
Where is your paperwork; insurance policies, living will, medical directives, Armed Services discharge or disability papers? Is there someone designated to know the location?
 
What are the legal documents that are needed for power of attorney, estate planning and disbursement of assets? When do they have to be completed?
 
What types of care services and facilities are available and what are the costs?
 
What will government programs pay for and how do you qualify?
 
There is a lot you can do now to put together a plan for your own long term care. You may have limited resources in the future or health problems that will inhibit your ability to take care of things you could do now. For example.
 
James and Cindy want to be able to stay in their home as they age. In order to do this, when they were in their 40’s they took out a long term care insurance policy that will pay for home care if it is needed. The policy will also pay for nursing home costs as a care option. With taking the policy at a younger age and in good health the monthly payments are low. Extra funds can now be put away for retirement without worries of having to deplete savings for care costs.
 
Or consider Sarah’s following experience:
 
After taking care of her own parents for many years, Sarah realized the importance of making, in advance, a plan and preparations for herself. She saw all of her parents’ assets dissipated in order for her father to qualify for Medicaid nursing home coverage. She didn’t want the same thing to happen to her. She took the time to create her own plan on paper– expressing her wishes for her own care. A trip to her attorney provided all the legal documents and estate planning she wanted to be in place to insure care for her and an inheritance for her children.
 
There is much to learn about long term care and there are a lot of new services and programs available to draw from.
 
The National Care Planning Council has gathered together an overall review of government and private long term care services both on the Council website, www.longtermcarelink.net and in their book The 4 Steps of Long Term Care Planning.

The 4 Steps of Long Term Care Planning provides comprehensive information about long term care planning. The design also allows you to record personal information, family agreements and directions on 20 planning sheets at the back of the book. Using this book as a single-source repository for information and directions makes it much easier for you or your care coordinator to carry out your wishes when the need for care occurs.

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

As we discussed last week, Joe wants to transfer his home to Jim, who lives there with his wife and children.  But let’s change the facts a bit.  Joe is not healthy but has the early stages of dementia and needs some in home assistance.  It is possible that within 5 years he will need nursing home care, so we are concerned about the 5 year Medicaid lookback.  What options do Joe and Jim have?

One possibility is for Jim to buy the home at a price that he can afford but that may be below fair market value.  If, for example, he purchases the home for $200,000 and it is worth $450,000, then $250,000 is considered a gift subject to the Medicaid transfer penalty.  Jim can spend down the $200,000 for his care but if he runs out of money then Jim may need to cover the cost of care until the 5 year time frame expires.

Now that Joe lives in Jim’s home, they could enter into an agreement for Joe to pay rent.  If Jim or his wife is providing care that Joe otherwise would need to hire an aide to do, then Joe could pay Jim to do it.  This is what is called a personal services contract.  Food, utilities, and other goods and services that Jim may be providing, can and should be paid for by Joe.  Perhaps the home needs to be modified to allow Joe to live there.  Jim could spend money to make those improvements when they become necessary, borrowing against the home. 

Some or all of these strategies may be ways for Jim to, in essence, pay Joe for some of the remaining uncompensated value of Joe’s home, over time, in a way that may be more affordable for Jim.  However, each of these financial arrangements must be in writing.  There are details that must be followed.  That’s because Medicaid presumes that any transfers of money or services is a gift, subject to a transfer penalty, unless it is in writing and at fair value.

A word of caution.  The Medicaid rules are complicated.  What will work in one state may not work in another.  What may suitable for one family may be entirely the wrong solution for another.  If you try to do it yourself and get it wrong, you may find yourself with a lengthy period of Medicaid ineligibility and no money to pay for care.  You need a knowledgeable and trusted elder law advisor to guide you through the maze of laws and regulations that leave hidden traps for the unwary.

For further information and advice in a New Jersey Medicaid or an estate planning matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Home ownership has long been a large part of the American dream.  Through the course of the 20th century, the percentage of Americans owning their homes rose considerably.   In many of these homes three generations lived under one roof.  Today, there still are many 3 generations homes.  The reasons for it are the same.  The grandparents often help care for their grandchildren while the parents are working.  Sometimes the grandparents need assistance and can’t live alone any longer. 

There is, however, a big difference between the households of the 20th century and those of the 21st century, which generation owns the home.  The parent homeowner of the 20th century now is the grandparent homeowner of the 21st century. 
 
So now that homeowner, we’ll call him Joe, is in his 70’s.  His son Jim and Jim’s wife and kids live with Joe.  They are concerned that as Joe ages and needs long term care they may lose the house.  Jim wants to buy a house but can’t afford it, even in today’s depressed real estate market.  So they come upon a solution.  Joe will transfer his house to Jim or perhaps sell to Jim at a reduced price, maybe enough to pay off Joe’s mortgage.  Jim will have a home of his own to raise his family and Joe will have the support of family should he need it.  A win – win scenario for everyone.  Right?

Well, not so fast.  If Jim doesn’t pay fair market value for the home then the uncompensated amount is treated as a transfer for less than fair value should Joe need Medicaid benefits in the next five years to pay for long term care. 
 
What to do?  Joe and Jim must understand that if Joe needs care there must be a plan in place to cover the cost of that care.  That plan could involve VA benefits if Joe is a veteran.  It could also include using Joe’s funds to pay for his care and long term care insurance benefits.  But, if these sources of payment still leave a gap then Jim will need to borrow against the home to pay for Joe’s care, which may mean putting off tapping into the equity to pay for renovations or other expenses. 

Provided these contingencies are covered, however, the home transfer can work well.  What happens, however, if Joe is not healthy when contemplating a transfer, but instead has dementia and already needs some care.  In that case, the home transfer is a little more complicated but I’ll address that in the next week’s post.

For further information and advice in a New Jersey Medicaid or an estate planning matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

As a general rule, when assets are transferred to third parties, the transfer results in a period of Medicaid ineligibility. Some transfers, however, are exempt and do not result in the imposition of a period of ineligibility for Medicaid. It is important to make transfers that are consistent with the estate planning goals of the client. If inconsistent transfers are made, they may result in litigation from beneficiaries of the estate who consider themselves to be treated unfairly.

1.      The Family Home
There are several limited exceptions from the general transfer rules relating to a principal residence, but you must be very careful in how you plan your transfer, otherwise the consequences are dreadful. These transfers are generally exempt.

Community Spouse
The residence can be transferred to the community spouse without penalty. A married couple can simply deed the house to the community spouse. There is no transfer penalty because the transfer is between spouses. In a typical situation, husband and wife own the home as tenants by the entirety. But, if one spouse enters a nursing home, and the community spouse predeceases that spouse, then by operation of law, title to the home will vest in the institutionalized spouse. The institutionalized spouse would then be required to sell the home and use the proceeds for nursing home care. In states that have a broad definition of estate for purposes of Medicaid estate recovery, like New Jersey, the home should always be transferred to the community spouse to avoid Medicaid estate recovery.

If the property is deeded to the community spouse, and that spouse dies first, the property can be left by the will of the community spouse to a special needs trust for the benefit of the institutionalized spouse or to the children. The elder law attorney must also be aware of the state elective share statute, which prohibits a person from disinheriting a spouse. Medicaid could, conceivably, take the position that failure of the surviving spouse to exercise his rights under the elective share statute constitutes a transfer, subject to the transfer penalty provisions.

Child Under 21, Blind, or Disabled
The home can be transferred to a child of the institutionalized individual who is under the age of 21, or a child of any age who is blind or disabled. For example, a person about to enter a nursing home has a daughter who is blind. The potential Medicaid applicant can transfer the home to the blind daughter as an exempt transfer, and there will be no transfer penalty. In a second marriage situation, the question remains whether the institutionalized individual could transfer ownership of the home to a stepchild who met the criteria of caregiver.

Sibling
The home can be transferred to a brother or sister of the institutionalized individual who already had an equity interest in the home prior to the transfer and who was residing in the home for a period of at least one year immediately before the individual becomes an institutionalized individual. It may not be necessary for the sibling to be named on the deed to the property for a year prior to the transfer. You can bet Medicaid will fight you on this.  The sibling may have an equity interest if he or she has paid taxes or other expenses and has actually lived in the home for a period of time. For example, a potential Medicaid applicant is not married and lives in his home with his brother. Each owns a portion of the house as tenants in common and they have been living together for more than one year. The potential Medicaid applicant would simply deed the property to the healthy sibling, and there would be no transfer penalty.

Caregiver Child
The home can be transferred to a caregiver child. A caregiver is defined as a son or daughter of the institutionalized individual who is residing in the individual’s home for a period of at least two years immediately before the date the individual becomes an institutionalized individual, and who has provided care to such individual that permitted the individual to reside at home rather than in an institution or facility. The care provided by the son or daughter must have been essential to the safety of the individual and consisted of activities such as, but not limited to, supervision of medication, monitoring of nutritional status, and ensuring the safety of the individual.

There may be an issue as to when the transfer of the home to the caregiver child must take place. In a New Jersey case, the Burlington County Board of Social Services contended that a deed transferred 90 days after institutionalization did not qualify, and that such transfers need be made within 30 days of institutionalization. The Administrative Law Judge held and the Director affirmed that there is no time set forth in the regulation as to when the deed must be given. The only reference to time is that the home must be the home in which the individual resided immediately prior to entering the nursing home. Based on this case, it would appear that a deed could be given at any time prior to, or subsequent to, entering a nursing home. For example, a potential Medicaid recipient is about to enter a nursing home. His daughter has lived with him for two years and provided a level of care sufficient to keep him out of a nursing home. The deed to the house can simply be deeded to the daughter. There would be no transfer penalty, because this is an exempt transfer.

Taxation
In transferring a home to an exempt child, consideration must be given to the gift tax rules, carry over basis, and the capital gains tax exclusion from the sale of a principal residence.

For further information and advice in any elder law matter, do not hesitate to contact me at 732-863-9900 Ext. 101 or 105, or fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

“When my grandmother developed dementia, my parents would try to get answers to questions about things like Medicare, benefits, insurance, Medicaid,” he said.  “We would get little snippets of information, a few answers, but no one seemed to be able to put it all together.  I thought there was a crying need for someone to do it right.”

This experience moved Niemann years later to become more involved in elder law and life care planning for the elderly.  Today, his law firm, Hanlon Niemann in Freehold, New Jersey focuses on issues affecting seniors such as elder law, Medicaid, Medicare, guardianship, asset and income protection planning, estate planning,  and how to find a long-term residence including assisted living, nursing home or independent care.

The firm has especially focused in on a growing need – people 80 and older who make up the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population.

“The special needs of these clients are significant and highly complex,” said Niemann.  “If you’re going to help service these special and vulnerable people you counsel, you must have a substantive grasp of the law, including rules related to Medicare/Medicaid and other government benefits.  It also takes a sensitivity of how to deal with people on an emotional level.” With many of his elderly clients confused by the intricacies of Medicare and Medicaid, their grown children also may feel frustrated.

Niemann said his firm employs a compassionate and inclusive approach.  For example, he said his elder clients might be under tremendous stress.  To put them at ease, he will spend 30 or 40 minutes discussing family and related topics before getting down to legal issues.  “How to find a long-term care residence, especially a nursing home is a huge issue for them and their families,” he said.

“How to get good care at home or elsewhere is another issue – and how to pay for it without going broke.”  People are afraid of becoming destitute.  They remember the effects of the Great Depression.

Another example of Niemann’s unique approach to help the elderly is having a registered nurse, licensed nursing home administrator and social worker on staff.  Their duties can, when appropriate, include participating in care-planning sessions, evaluating existing care plans and assessing how the nursing home resident is progressing under that plan.  In addition, elderly clients are apt to listen to the advice of Niemann’s firm because of the presence of a registered nurse and licensed nursing home administrator and social worker.

“Our staff is very knowledgeable and each adds a lot to the discussion about an aging client’s best interests.  “We like the idea of having clinical issues, legal issues and financial issues on the table all at the same time,” Niemann said.
 
If you have any questions about the contents of this article, please call Fredrick P. Niemann personally at 732-863-9900 or e-mail him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Many people find themselves responsible for paying for the care of their parents in old age. The parents did not plan it that way and the children did not see it coming. According to a just-released survey, these adult children of aging parents have found themselves vastly unprepared.

The survey found: 

• 63% of caregivers have no plan as to how they will pay for their parents’ care over the next five years.
• 62% say the cost of caring for a parent has impacted their ability to plan for their own financial future.

“With an estimated 34 million Americans providing care for older family members, the survey’s results indicate a financial crisis in the making,” says Joe Buckheit, Publisher of AgingCare, a website and online forum for family caregivers.

“Medicare only covers long-term care for a short time, and only under strict rules. Medi-gap insurance helps, but does not cover all costs. The burden of paying for long-term care often rests with the family,” Buckheit says.

“The caregivers’ lack of planning is impacting their own financial future.”

Long-term care costs are not the only expenses caregivers bear.

“Family members responsible for ailing loved ones provide not only hands-on care but often reach into their own pockets to pay for many daily expenses, including groceries, household goods, drugs, medical co-payments and transportation,” says Buckheit.

“Americans who are already strapped for cash by the rising price of gas and food are unable to afford these additional expenses.”

The survey found: 

• 34% spend $300 or more per month out of their own pocket for caregiving expenses.
• 54% have sacrificed spending money on themselves to pay for care of their parents.

Work Issues
Making matters worse, caring for aging parents often impacts adult children at their workplace as well. The survey found: 

• 43% have had to take time off work due to caregiving responsibilities.
• 48% say they are earning less money at work as a result of caregiving.
• 25% have been fired or had to quit their job as a result of caregiving.

Physical and Emotional Toll
Despite potentially making less money and doling out more, more than half of the caregivers surveyed are spending what equates to a full-time work week   • 40 hours or more  •  on caregiving duties  •  many in addition to their full-time careers outside the home. 

• 53% of caregivers provide care 40 or more hours per week.
• 37% provide care more than 80 hours per week.
• 21% say they never get a break from caregiving.
• 36% get a break of 5 hours or less a week.

The survey indicates that today’s caregivers face a triple financial threat: unplanned-for caregiving expenses, less money for their own needs and reduced time in the workplace.