Archive for the ‘estate planning’ Category

Estate Administration by the Use of the New Federal Tax Portability Option

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

By:  Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a New Jersey Estate Planning Attorney

This is the 3rd part of a three part series on credit shelter trust and the new federal estate tax portability.

Blended Family Estates

Reliance on portability may also defeat, either intentionally or unintentionally, the testamentary plan of the pre-deceased spouse.  It is common today for one or both spouses to have children from prior marriages.  There is no assurance that a surviving spouse who inherits outright the estate of his or her pre-deceased spouse will leave that property to the pre-deceased spouse’s children.  It is equally common for a surviving spouse to remarry.  If such a remarriage ends in divorce, it is possible that some or all of the inherited assets may be subject to division by the family law court.  If the marriage is successful, it is equally possible that the surviving spouse will leave his or her new spouse some or all of the assets inherited from the pre-deceased spouse.

Tax Considerations

A credit trust is a potentially more tax efficient vehicle than reliance on portability.  A property drafted credit trust can be used to sprinkle taxable income to beneficiaries in lower tax brackets, which cannot occur when property is left outright to the surviving spouse without such distributions being treated as taxable gifts.  If portability is relied upon and the pre-deceased spouse leaves his or her surviving spouse to children during his lifetime will constitute taxable gifts to the extent they exceed the surviving spouse’s annual exclusion.

Lastly, planners should keep in mind that portability will sunset for people dying on or after January 1, 2013.  Planners relying on portability are limited to factual situations in which both spouses die prior to that date.  In most situations, it appears estate plans that use credit trusts are far more practical and far less dangerous than reliance on portability.

For more information on credit shelter trusts and the new federal estate tax portability, please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Have you selected the Right Person as your Trust: Caution: Your Decision Matters

Friday, October 7th, 2011

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a NJ Trust Attorney

When creating an estate plan under your will, an important decision you will have is who to name as your fiduciary. By fiduciary, I mean your Executor under your Lat Will and Testament.  A fiduciary is a fancy legal term for the person who will take care of your assets and Estate if you are unable to do it yourself, such as the 1) executor of an estate, 2) the trustee of a trust, or 3) an attorney-in-fact under a power of attorney. Your first reaction might be to name one of your children as a fiduciary, but if you want to avoid conflict among your children, this might not be the best option.

When naming a fiduciary, be confident you can trust the individual.  This is why people often name family members as fiduciaries. However problems can arise when a parent with two or more children names one child as a fiduciary. According to Fredrick P. Niemann, an attorney from Freehold, New Jersey, who spoke on the issue of family harmony at a recent trust seminar, a child is often not the best fiduciary for several reasons:

• It is hard for a child to be completely objective.
• Children often disagree over many things, including how long the estate should take to complete, the selling of assets, and  the division of personal property.
• Children often don’t communicate with each other well.
• Unresolved lifetime rivalries.

An alternative is to hire a professional fiduciary. A professional fiduciary can be a bank, investment firm with trust administration experience with trust powers, a certified public accountant, or a trust company. A professional fiduciary will charge a fee, but the fee is established ahead of time. In addition, because a professional is experienced in managing money and property, your assets are more likely to increase under this person’s or institution’s guidance.

To ensure that your family remains partially involved and has some input, you can include a provision that allows one or more family members to discharge the fiduciary if they feel the professional is not doing a good job. This will allow your family to make sure the fiduciary is performing properly without having the burden of acting as fiduciary.

For further information and advice in estate planning with living ,revocable trust, do not hesitate to contact me toll-free at (888) 800-7442, or e-mail me at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.  We can meet to discuss your questions and issues.  For further information, go to http://www.youtube.com/user/NJElderLawCenter#p/search/6/GxL71TQgsWw to learn more.

Estate Administration by the Use of the New Federal Tax Portability Option

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

By: Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a New Jersey Estate Planning Attorney

         
This is the first part of a three part series on credit shelter trusts and the new federal estate tax portability laws.

Does portability mean the end of the “Credit Shelter Trust”?

The answer is no!  The 2010 Tax Act has made it possible for the estate of a surviving spouse to make use of the unused estate tax exemption of his or her predeceased spouse. Some have suggested that portability makes it unnecessary to continue to draft estate plans that include credit shelter trusts.

Understanding portability involves understanding two new estate tax terms:  the basic exclusion amount and the deceased spousal unused exclusion amount (DSUEA).

The new $5million estate tax exclusion is available for people dying beginning January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012.  Portability will exist only if both spouses die within the next 18 months.

A second issue may make use of his or her predeceased spouse’s exclusion, if the predeceased spouse’s estate files a timely estate tax return.  Advocates of using portability in lieu of credit trusts argue that portability reduces the cost of estate planning because plans relying on portability will be simpler documents to draft and the survivor will be faced with less post-death complexity because the number of trusts the survivor must contend with will be reduced.  Both assumptions are questionable.

In our next post we will discuss why.

For more information, please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll free at (888) 800-7442 or e-mail him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

Beware the Beneficiary Form

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

Part 3 of 4
By: Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq.
         
This is the third post of a four part series on estate planning by use of a beneficiary designation form.

Avoid leaving assets to minors outright. Also avoid disabled people, and in certain cases, your estate or spouse.  If you do, a court will appoint someone to look after the funds, a cumbersome and often expensive process.  Also think about what can happen when the money reverts to the child at age 18 or 21, depending on the state.

I’ve seen 18-year olds receive proceeds from life insurance policies.  While one of them still has her money, “the other two bought and wrecked brand new cars, splurged on clothes, and champagne, lent money to friends and generally went from $150,000.00 to actually owing money in just one year.”  The problems could have been avoided if the parents had set up trusts for the kids payable at, say age 30, and named the trusts as beneficiaries of the life-insurance policies.

Disabled children and adults-require “special or supplemental needs trusts” that preserve their ability to receive government benefits, as even a small outright inheritance can prevent them or disqualify them from getting public aid and assistance.

For retirement plans, the biggest mistake is to name your estate as beneficiary, because that means when you die, the full amount of the plan must be paid out and taxed within five years. Individual beneficiaries, by contrast, could stretch out the distributions and the taxes for decades.  Because many people have a large portion of their assets in retirement accounts, they also should be sure that the combination of the distribution arrangements on those accounts and their wills provide for family members as they wish, particularly in complex situations such as a second marriage when there are children from the first union.

Beneficiary designations are crucial to estates in New Jersey.  For more information please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.   For further information, go to http://www.youtube.com/user/NJElderLawCenter#p/search/0/XpuVawQtBnQ to learn more.

ESTATE PLANNING FOR A SECOND MARRIAGE – PROTECTING YOUR SPOUSE AND YOUR CHILDREN

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., an Estate Planning Attorney
Individuals don’t get serious about estate planning until they are well into middle age.  By then, some of them are in second marriages. They are married, and one or both spouses have children from a previous marriage.  Estate planning should be taken very seriously because each the spouse may want to provide for each other and their own children.  If you’re in such a situation, proceed cautiously.

SECOND MARRIAGES AND YOUR RETIREMENT PLAN

In a second marriage, one or both spouses may have a sizable retirement account such as an IRA, SEP or 401 (k).  One technique is to name the other spouse as primary beneficiary of the IRA, with the children as secondary beneficiaries.  This approach is common in first marriages, in which the children are the offspring of both spouses, but it can lead to trouble in a blended family:  Real trouble.

 EXAMPLE 1: Tom Jones (no, not the singer) has $500,000 in his 401 (k).  He names his wife Martha as the primary beneficiary and his three children from a prior marriage as the secondary beneficiaries.  Thus, if Martha predeceases the children, they will inherit the IRA.  Even if Martha does inherit the account, the balance will pass to Tom’s children at Martha’s death.

There are several mistakes in this approach.  First, Martha can use the IRA at will as she takes required minimum distributions.  She can take out all $500,000 at once, pay the income tax, and then either spend the money or give it to, her own children not Tom’s children.

Second, in this example Martha is a surviving spouse and only beneficiary of Tom’s IRA.  Under the federal tax code, Martha can roll over Tom’s IRA to her own new or existing IRA (no other beneficiary can do this).  Then Martha can name any beneficiaries she wishes, such as her own children.

In either example, there is no assurance that Tom’s children will see a penny of his $500,000 IRA.

How can Tom avoid this outcome if he wants to provide for Martha and his own children?  One strategy is to divide his $500,000 IRA into two $250,000 IRA’S.  He can designate Martha as the beneficiary of one IRA; his children can be co-beneficiaries of the second IRA.  Alternatively, Tom can leave the entire $500,000 IRA to his children, who can spread out required distributions over their longer life expectancy and thus enjoy extended tax deferral.  If Tom adopts this plan, he can leave other assets to Martha, depending on the size of his estate and her economic needs.

TRUSTS TRAPS

In second marriages, spouses also can create trusts in their estate planning.  The first spouse might leave assets in trust for the surviving spouse, who will get the trust income and access to the trust principal.  At the surviving spouse’s death, the balance of trust assets may pass to the children of the spouse who funded the trust.  Some trusts can be qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trusts and defer estate tax.

Trusts can play a valuable role in your estate planning.  Trusts can cause problems in second marriages. With the situation described before, the trustee could be conflicted between investing for current income (which would benefit the surviving spouse) and investing for long-term growth (which would benefit the children).  Also, the children may have to wait many years before receiving their inheritance if the first spouse to die leaves all of his assets to such a trust.

Dividing and separating out the estate might be a better option.  Some assets could be left to the surviving spouse and some to the children, outright or in separate trusts.  If the spouses fear that such a plan would leave insufficient amounts to the beneficiaries, they might buy life insurance and increase the total estate value.

If you have any questions about this post, please call Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a knowledgeable Estate Planning Attorney. He can be reached toll free at 888 800-7442 or by email at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.  For further information, go to http://www.youtube.com/user/NJElderLawCenter#p/search/0/8be14yDEeJc to learn more.

Beware the Beneficiary Form

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

By: Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. an Estate Planning Attorney

This is the second post on the subject of beneficiary designations and their importance in New Jersey probate and estate planning.

Individuals, trusts, charities, other organizations, your estate, or no one at all can be named a beneficiary of your assets.  You might specify one or more people or name a specific group of individuals, such as “all my grandchildren who survive me.” This might include current and future grandkids and spare you from having to update forms as families change and grow.  However, it generally would not include step-grandchildren; they’d need to be designated specifically by name.

Avoid the tendency to choose a different beneficiary for each of your accounts.  One woman left her estate equally to her two daughters in her will, but named one daughter or the other as beneficiary of her various bank and brokerage accounts.  The result:  Just about all of her assets passed outside of her estate, and one daughter received much more than the other.

“That was very unpleasant for everybody.”  It would have been better, if the mother had named both daughters as beneficiaries of each of her accounts or not named anyone and allowed the assets to flow into her estate, where the assets would have been distributed according to her will.

Watch out, too, for beneficiary forms that don’t allow your assets to pass “per stripes,” or equally among the branches of a family.  Say you name your adult three children as beneficiaries of your IRA.  If one of them predeceases you, you might want that child’s share to go to his or her children.  However, many standard beneficiary forms provide that your two remaining adult children would share the proceeds to the exclusion of your deceased child.
For more information on naming beneficiaries on various institutional forms, please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com

Beware the Beneficiary Form – This is a Four Part Series

Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

Part 1 of 4

By: Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. an Estate Planning Attorney

Do you think your estate planning is done once you’ve gone to the trouble of making a will or trust? Think again. All your hard work can be undone with a stroke of a pen when you open a bank, brokerage or retirement account. Individuals have the option of naming beneficiaries directly on a wide range of financial products. When the account owner dies, the assets go directly to the beneficiaries named on the accounts, bypassing the sometimes long and costly probate process. The problem: Because these beneficiary designations override your will or trust, they need to be carefully coordinated with your over-all estate plan.

People don’t realize the importance of this. A carelessly named beneficiary on a financial account can cause a loved one to be disinherited, a disabled child to lose government benefits, and heirs to be slapped with a big tax bill. Seeing so many cases like this, I’ve coined a term for it: “bank-teller estate destruction.”

Many people simply don’t remember whom they named as beneficiaries of accounts they opened years ago. Fredrick P. Niemann, a Freehold New Jersey lawyer, tells of one man who wrote a will leaving his entire estate to his long time girlfriend, and on his deathbed recalled that he had certificates of deposit naming relatives, some since deceased, as beneficiaries. The man tried to change the beneficiary designations before he died, but the case is now mired in a lawsuit.

Advisers tend to recommend reviewing all of your beneficiary designations regularly, at least every few years, but certainly after you experience a life-changing event, such as a marriage, divorce, birth or death of a loved one. Job-changers and retirees also take note: Beneficiary designations on retirement plans don’t carry over when you roll a 401(k) to a new employer’s plan or to an IRA, or when you convert a regular IRA to a Roth IRA.

What kinds of accounts can have beneficiaries?

US savings bonds have had forms for naming beneficiaries for 50 years. Bank accounts and certificates of deposit can be made payable on death (POD) to a beneficiary. Same with so called Transfer on Death (TOD) registrations for securities, including stocks, bonds and mutual funds. Life-insurance benefits and retirement –plan assets are paid directly to the beneficiaries named on those accounts.

POD and TOD accounts were devised as alternatives to joint accounts, which also bypass probate. When one owner of a joint account dies, the assets automatically go to the surviving owner. But this is not a particularly safe way to leave funds to anyone because the assets are subject to your co-owner’s whims and creditors.

For more information on beneficiary designation and how they relate to New Jersey probate and estate planning, please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com. In our next post we will address who can be listed on a beneficiary designation form.

Do you think your estate planning is done once you’ve gone to the trouble of making a will or trust? Think again. All your hard work can be undone with a stroke of a pen when you open a bank, brokerage or retirement account. Individuals have the option of naming beneficiaries directly on a wide range of financial products. When the account owner dies, the assets go directly to the beneficiaries named on the accounts, bypassing the sometimes long and costly probate process. The problem: Because these beneficiary designations override your will or trust, they need to be carefully coordinated with your over-all estate plan.

People don’t realize the importance of this. A carelessly named beneficiary on a financial account can cause a loved one to be disinherited, a disabled child to lose government benefits, and heirs to be slapped with a big tax bill. Seeing so many cases like this, I’ve coined a term for it: “bank-teller estate destruction.”

Many people simply don’t remember whom they named as beneficiaries of accounts they opened years ago. Fredrick P. Niemann, a Freehold New Jersey lawyer, tells of one man who wrote a will leaving his entire estate to his long time girlfriend, and on his deathbed recalled that he had certificates of deposit naming relatives, some since deceased, as beneficiaries. The man tried to change the beneficiary designations before he died, but the case is now mired in a lawsuit.

Advisers tend to recommend reviewing all of your beneficiary designations regularly, at least every few years, but certainly after you experience a life-changing event, such as a marriage, divorce, birth or death of a loved one. Job-changers and retirees also take note: Beneficiary designations on retirement plans don’t carry over when you roll a 401(k) to a new employer’s plan or to an IRA, or when you convert a regular IRA to a Roth IRA.

What kinds of accounts can have beneficiaries?

US savings bonds have had forms for naming beneficiaries for 50 years. Bank accounts and certificates of deposit can be made payable on death (POD) to a beneficiary. Same with so called Transfer on Death (TOD) registrations for securities, including stocks, bonds and mutual funds. Life-insurance benefits and retirement –plan assets are paid directly to the beneficiaries named on those accounts.

POD and TOD accounts were devised as alternatives to joint accounts, which also bypass probate. When one owner of a joint account dies, the assets automatically go to the surviving owner. But this is not a particularly safe way to leave funds to anyone because the assets are subject to your co-owner’s whims and creditors.

For more information on beneficiary designation and how they relate to New Jersey probate and estate planning, please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com. In our next post we will address who can be listed on a beneficiary designation form.

After Divorce, What Agreements Should be Reviewed or Adjusted to Assure Your Intended Beneficiaries Receive What You Want Them To Receive ?

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq., a NJ Estate Planning Attorney

It is important that you review any agreements you may have to ensure they comply with your intended estate plan. Property settlement agreements from the divorce with your first spouse, as well as marital agreements you may have with your second spouse, whether it be pre-marital or post-marital, should all be reviewed to ensure compliance. Additional agreements may have to be created with your spouse as desired. Certain plans you may have previously entered into may need to be adjusted if you have new beneficiaries that you wish to receive your assets. These include Life Insurance policies and retirement plans. Other agreements specific to your situation may have to be created or adjusted depending on your situation.

Estate planning is important for your future. Entering into a second marriage brings about a number of significant issues that must be addressed. It is imperative you see an experienced New Jersey estate planning attorney to ensure that your estate plan is well thought out. Please contact Fredrick P. Niemann, a knowledgeable NJ Estate Planning Attorney today if you have any questions pertaining to estate planning and your second marriage. He can be reached toll-free at 888-800-7442 or by email at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com. He looks forward to hearing from you.

Do you have a question(s) not addressed here?  If so, contact Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. toll-free at (888) 800-7442 or e-mail him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com to schedule a consultation about your particular needs.  He welcomes your calls and inquiries and you’ll find him very approachable and easy to talk to.

Trust Decanting in Estate Planning is a Great Strategy to Change an Irrevocable Trust

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. a NJ Estate Planning and Trust Attorney

Irrevocable trusts are beneficial for estate planning tax purposes. They allow you to place your assets into trust and therefore avoid the estate tax involved when it is time to pass on your estate, along with other tax benefits. However, these tax benefits are not without a price. When you place your assets into an irrevocable trust, you are generally not allowed to modify the terms of the trust anymore. You no longer own the assets. The trustee of the trust will manage the assets and terms of the trust until the beneficiaries receive the assets. Unfortunately for us, circumstances often change in our lives. This can lead to an adjustment in our desires as to the terms of the trust we created. Irrevocable trusts leave us in a bind however, as they are much more difficult to change the terms of. Without getting the Courts involved, the best method to adjust the terms of your irrevocable trust is by decanting it.

For estate planning objectives, decanting a trust essentially involves the trustee of the irrevocable trust taking the assets and placing them in a new trust with different terms. This is arguably the most flexibility one will receive when placing assets in an irrevocable trust.  Unlike other states, New Jersey law does not have a statute that specifically addresses decanting. However, the NJ Courts have allowed decanting in situations in which the transfer of assets to a new trust was for the benefit of the beneficiary and in which the trustee completed the transfer voluntarily, not under any directions or stipulations. Courts have allowed this based on a clause that is placed in the majority of irrevocable trusts, which states that distributions may be made “to or for the benefit of a beneficiary”. Therefore, if the distribution to the new trust is for the benefit of the beneficiary, it will likely be allowed assuming certain specific requirements are followed.

Decanting a trust is a very complicated process. There are numerous New Jersey requirements that must be followed. It is important you see an experienced estate planning attorney to assure that your decanting is successful and does not fail due to a simple requirement that you are unfamiliar with. Please call Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. today toll-free at 855-376-5291 or email him at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com. Mr. Niemann is an experienced, knowledgeable trust and estate planning attorney and would be more than happy to discuss any trust or estate planning matter you may have.